Best UPSC Academy in Hyderabad
The role of Governors in India, particularly in states like Tamil Nadu, has come under scrutiny due to recent incidents. The issue has prompted discussions on the powers and challenges associated with the gubernatorial office. Understanding the constitutional provisions and historical perspectives is crucial for evaluating the need for reforms.
Assent to the bill, making it an act.
Withholding assent, resulting in rejection.
Returning non-money bills to the state legislature for reconsideration.
Reservation for the president’s consideration under specific circumstances.
The discretionary nature of the governor’s powers.
Potential delays in granting assent, impacting legislative processes.
Appointment Challenges:
Governors appointed by the President on central government advice, raising concerns about political neutrality.
Governors’ discretionary powers leading to conflicts with elected state governments.
Instances of interference in state matters, dismissal of governments, and recommendations for President’s rule.
Governors acting as Union government agents, potentially compromising their accountability to the state.
The governor’s immunity from legal scrutiny while in office.
Divergent Views in Constituent Assembly:
Some members critical of provisions mirroring the Government of India Act, 1935.
Concerns about governors acting as agents of the Centre.
Defended existing provisions, emphasizing governors’ collaborative roles with state governments.
Limited discussion on potential conflicts and governors aligning with the Centre’s wishes.
Should the Office of Governor be Abolished?
Imprudent due to the necessity of a head of state and government in the Westminster parliamentary system.
Unnecessary as alternatives like judicial intervention or constitutional reform are viable.
Judicial Intervention: Supreme Court monitoring governors’ conduct to prevent arbitrary actions. Upholding the federal principle of Indian polity.
Appointment and Removal Process Reform: Transparent and consultative mechanisms for governor appointments. More challenging removal processes, requiring state legislature resolutions or judicial inquiries.
Enhanced Accountability and Legitimacy: Granting governor a President-like status, making them accountable to the state legislature.
Elected Representative Status: Electing the governor by the state legislature or the people, enhancing accountability and legitimacy.
Impeachability: Making governors impeachable by the state legislature on constitutional violations or misconduct.
Sarkaria Commission (1988):
Emphasized collaboration between governors and state governments.
Governors’ discretionary powers to be used sparingly.
Appointment committee comprising the Prime Minister, Home Minister, Speaker, and Chief Minister.
Governors allowed to complete their term, removal only on proven misbehaviour or incapacity.
Recommending removal only by a state legislature resolution for stability and autonomy.
Deleting the phrase “during the pleasure of the President.”
Affirming the President’s authority to remove governors but emphasizing justifiable reasons.
The discourse on the role of governors necessitates nuanced reforms rather than outright abolition. Transparent appointments, increased accountability, and limited discretionary powers are proposed solutions. Striking a balance between state and central interests is essential for the effective functioning of the governor’s office without compromising democratic principles. The ongoing discussions should guide comprehensive reforms to align the gubernatorial office with contemporary democratic values.